Saturday, December 22, 2012

Catholic Faithful Donaire Favored By God

NEW CATHOLIC CHAMPION. DONAIRE INVOKED ST. MICHAEL'S INTERCESSION IN PERSONAL TWEETER BEFORE MARCHING TO THE RING.

shar.es
“The Filipino Flash” delivered a dominant performance against Mexico's Jorge “Travieso” Arce to bring back renewed hope in the wake of Pacquiao’s loss to Juan Manuel Marquez. Donaire's resounding lead left hook also effectively ended Arce's career.
1Unlike · ·

  • Insatiable Gonzaga 17m Nonito Donaire Jr. @filipinoflash
    1st foremost I wnt 2thank God, St. Michael, all my Archangels 4 protecting me giving me awareness focus everything that ws shown tonite.
  • Rodel Asingayan Baquiran Not only proud as a Filipino but also as a Catholic.....
  • Bhoy Peligrino Is it a coincident? 2:59 seconds of the third round by Donaire and the 2:59 seconds of the sixth round by Pacman? Pls think of this, 2+5+9=16, 1+6 = 7. We all know how powerful is number 7 and to whom it belongs. 3 is also a powerful number and we know what it stands for. 6 is the weakest number and we also know to whom it belongs. Does it mean it is sending a message to someone? I think so.
    7 = number of Heaven
    3 = Trinity
    6 = the father of all lies
  • Gerald John P. Soliman Isn't his opponent also Catholic?
  • John Emperador Calling fellow apologists who may have 'access' and or connection to "The Flash", it's high time to make the necessary move before 'monied oriented heretics' trail on him. Just to borrow a medical parlance, prevention is better than cure.
  • Jeanne d'Arce => Gerald John P. Soliman, yes, they are both Catholics. And we thank God for that. Neither of them are duped by the ravenous wolves of Born Again Evangelicals. Born Again are pagans. They don't believe Jesus is God for nine months in the womb of Mary. Why one Catholic won over another? Is the same question as: why God favors Abel's offerings over Cain's? If you have brain, use it.
  • Insatiable Gonzaga John Emperador correct we know he is a target by Fundamentalist pastors to brainwash, any CFDs around Gensan and Manila should try to approach Nonito and give him Catholic Apologetic books
  • John Emperador The parish priest in gensan and here in manila shld be tapped for this mission together with r fellow apologists nearby.
  • Jeanne d'Arce Fr. Abe, may I repost your articles on Pacquiao's devastating defeat and Donaire's outstanding victory as initial posts of my blog I am launching asap.
  • Manny Ambanloc Rosario the question Gerald John P. Soliman asked is the same question asked by Archbishop-emeritus Oscar Cruz. @Jeanne d'Arce, can you imagine yourself telling the retired archbishop "If you have brain, use it"?
  • The Splendor of the Church Fanpage YES BRO. Jeanne d'Arce... JUST PUT THE NAME OF THE ORIGINAL AUTHOR AND THE LINK TO THE ORIGINAL BLOG, OUR SPLENDOR.
  • Jeanne d'Arce =>Manny Ambanloc Rosario. Please share with us the question of Archbishop-emeritus Oscar Cruz, so I will not be barking at the wrong tree. Provide links to authenticate your sources. Thanks.
  • Manny Ambanloc Rosario I read it from an online news article by the Manila Bulletin. Here's the link: http://www.mb.com.ph/articles/385052/mommy-d-blames-son-s-loss-to-his-renewed-faith#.UNQOMayeMSa
    ------------------------------
    Meanwhile, former Catholic Bishops’ Conferenc
    e of the Philippines (CBCP) President Oscar V. Cruz dismissed Mommy D’s claim that Manny’s shift in religion has had a hand in his loss describing it as “mababaw.”

    In a report by ABS-CBN News, Monday, Cruz believes Manny didn’t win the fight simply because “napuruhan siya ni Marquez, ganoon lang.”
    --------------------------------------
    Now here's his question which is similar to Mr. Soliman's:

    He pointed out: “And as far as boxing is concerned – or other sports – paano kung pareho Catholic ang nasa ring? Sino ang ipapatalo ng Diyos?”
    ------------------------------------
    Now, if you were sitting right next to him in that interview, will you answer:

    "Why one Catholic won over another? Is the same question as: why God favors Abel's offerings over Cain's? IF YOU HAVE BRAIN, USE IT." (~Jeanne d'Arce)
  • Jeanne d'Arce => Manny Ambanloc Rosario, The retired Archbishop Oscar V. Cruz is entitled to his own opinion and I respect him for that. Being a man of God soon to be reunited with his Maker, Arch. Cruz is purifying his soul even more by freeing it of any hatred in any form. These past days he was interviewed by Anthony Taberna, an Iglesia ni Cristo, in his Umagang Kay Ganda segment. Like you to me, Anthony was trying to fish out of Arch. Cruz a hint of antipathy against the advocates of the RH Bill, but the response of the retired prelate was like a slap to the INC’s face: “No, Anthony, He said we must love one another.” (Or, something to that effect.)

    Mr. Soliman’s seemingly harmless query, “Isn't his opponent also Catholic?” has more to it than meets the eye. What Born Again Evangelicals were trying to hide from those they deceived into perverting in their newly invented American false faith was that Pacquiao loses to Marquez because, like the younger widows, he apostatized from the true Church and true Christ and incurred CONDEMNATION for breaking his first pledge (1 Tm 3:15-16, 5:11-12).

    Anent the two Catholic faithful boxers, Donaire and Arce, which I likened to Abel and Cain, respectively, the all-knowing God favored the Filipino Catholic boxer because He knew that after the bout, Donaire will praise God, St. Michael and all the Archangels as reported by Fr. Abe Arganiosa’s post in this URL: http://www.splendorofthechurch.com.ph/2012/12/16/catholic-filipino-nonito-donaire-knocked-out-his-opponent-in-the-3rd-round/

    Prudence demands prudence, so Manny Ambanloc Rosario, it’s my turn to ask you: Why does Born Again Evangelicals don't believe Jesus Christ is God for nine months in the womb of Mary? Your doctrine said, the divinity and humanity of Jesus Christ is inseparable, and then how come you are preaching that they got separated in Mary’s womb? Are you contradicting yourselves? If you have brain, you know what to do.

    Show us your mettle or be silent forever.
  • Manny Ambanloc Rosario Sir, I can't see the reason why you respect the retired Archbishop for his view and insult Mr. Soliman when he holds the same view. Please tell me how that does not earned you the label "Respecter of Persons"-- showing favor to one on account of rank or title.
    ------------------------------------------
    Regarding your question, can you show me an official evangelical statement of faith that teaches so. You can consult the following:
    1. documents from the Laussane Movement
    2. The Gospel of Jesus Christ: an Evangelical Celebration
    3. The Westminster Confession of Faith, or the Westminster Larger and Shorter Cathechisms
    4. The 1689 London Baptist Confession
    5. or even the Pinoy document: the statement of faith of the Philippine Council of Evangelical Churches (PCEC)

    Show us from our written confessions where we believe that Jesus is not God for nine months in the womb of Blessed Mary.
  • Gerald John P. Soliman @ Jeanne d' Arce, it is sad that you compared two Catholic boxers with Cain and Abel. Are you telling me that some of your Catholic athletes are wicked like Cain?

    Also, please answer the question of Manny Ambanloc Rosario, where did you get the notion that we don't believe that Jesus is God for nine months in Mary's womb?
  • Jeanne d'Arce Hi gays, sorry to keep you waiting but I’m really busy today. Will chat with you again later today, ok? For the meantime, here’s something to perk you up and give you time to prepare your refutations. Enjoy.

    Does God prohibit sacred images?

    By Je
    anne d’Arce

    Last night we had a lively discussion whether his change of religion caused Boxing Champ Manny Pacquiao his two consecutive losses. [See extensive discussion on my blog: http://bornagainstanti-christandanti-mary.blogspot.com/2012/12/apostate-manny-pacquiao.html]

    I opined that when Pacquiao was still a Roman Catholic, he always wore a Rosary every time he enter the ring, knelt down in his corner to pray in the Catholic way and made the Sign of the Cross every start, in-between rumbles and end of each round. But now that he has apostatized and was indoctrinated by the newly invented American false faith, Pacquiao turned his back completely from his first faith and all Her sacred teachings and practices. Pacquiao, like all Born Again Evangelicals, do their worship by singing, gyrating and dancing while flailing and waving their hands in the empty air. I told my friends that the invisible Satan and his demons may be positioning themselves in front, on top, at the sides, or besides the worshipers and laughing and jeering at them and may even join them dancing gangnam style. It fits perfectly as Satan is the ruler of the power of the air, the spirit that is now at work in the disobedient (Eph 2:1-2). Aren’t all Born Again disobedient apostates from the Catholic Church of God? Yes, indeed, they are.

    Marienna, one of my friends reacted as she too was a former Catholic and apostatized to the Pentecostal faith because she was uncomfortable with the sacred images in the Catholic Church. I asked her where in the Bible God prohibits the use of sacred images as visual aids in praying to Him and His Saints. She mentioned the Ten Commandments where it says: You shall not carve idols for yourselves in the shape of anything in the sky above or on the earth below or in the waters beneath the earth (Dt 5:8).

    So, I pointed out to our group how God was very explicit in prohibiting the shape of anything in the sky above or on the earth below or in the waters beneath the earth. IT IS VERY CLEAR TOO THAT GOD DID NOT PROHIBIT THE SHAPE OF ANYTHING IN PARADISE WHERE GOD AND HIS SAINTS ARE LIVING NOW.

    Marienna objected that Paradise is part of the sky above. I corrected her that the sky above refers to the created heavens (cf Gen 1:1) and does not include the uncreated heaven called Paradise. The created heavens are the first and second heavens, that is, the atmosphere and the outer space, respectively, while the uncreated Heaven was the third heaven aka Paradise (2 Cor 12:2-4). The first and second heavens are subject to time, distance, boundary, aging, obliteration and hence, finite, while the third Heaven was timeless, unbounded, indestructible, and infinite. The infinite God cannot exist in a finite world unless He is within a Divine Soul like that of Jesus’.

    Marienna forces her defense, asking, how sure am I that there are Saints already in Paradise? Actually, there are numerous mentions of Saints in heaven in the Bible but it would be impractical fetching a Bible and search the appropriate verses therein, so I just mentioned Dismas, the repentant criminal crucified alongside the Lord Jesus Christ. Jesus gave His immutable promise to Dismas in this wise, "Amen, I say to you, today you will be with me in Paradise (Lk 23:43)."

    I said, “Marienna, if God allowed a repentant criminal to be one of the first to populate Paradise, then how much more God will be exceedingly exultant in welcoming the immaculate, the righteous, and the just to fill His Kingdom?”

    Therefore, it is crystal clear that the images of Jesus, Mary and the Saints and Angels in Paradise are excluded from the prohibition of God on the making of images. Strictly speaking, if we are to take the commandment literally, even our ID pictures are taboo, but not the images of those in Paradise.

    Catholics don’t pray to the images of Jesus Christ and the Saints per se but to the Sacred Beings they are representing. To me, sacred images are sort of gadgets to communicate with God and His Saints – a tangible means of telepathy with the spirits and souls in Paradise. Is it a sin if we pray to the Saints instead of directly praying to God and Jesus? Of course not, the Saints in Paradise forms part of the body of Jesus of which He is the head (Col 1:8). Will God be jealous if we pray to His hands, His feet, His abs, etc. instead of to His head only? I don’t think so.

    Marienna was pensive, so one of us suggested changing the topic and being obedient that we are, so we did.
  • Jeanne d'Arce => Gerald John P. Soliman, I thought Born Again Evangelicals are Bible toting experts. You are telling us some of our Catholic athletes are wicked like Cain. I didn’t say that, you did. What I said was quite a mile apart: “Why one Catholic won over another? Is the same question as: why God favors Abel's offerings over Cain's? If you have brain, use it.” Obviously, you didn’t. Can you point out to me where I said, “wicked like Cain”?

    Of all the BAEs, you should be the one who will know why God favored Abel over Cain. It is not the wickedness of Cain but the righteousness of Abel that earned the graces of God. Here’s the proof:

    By faith Abel offered to God a sacrifice greater than Cain's. Through this he was attested to be righteous, God bearing witness to his gifts, and through this, though dead, he still speaks. (Hebrews 11:4)

    Because of the righteousness of Abel, God favored him. The wickedness of Cain which you are telling us must be his murderous action afterwards, and his later dastardly act was not the measure used by God whom to favor but by the way they love God through their offerings. Here’s the complete picture:

    The man had relations with his wife Eve, and she conceived and bore Cain, saying, "I have produced a man with the help of the LORD." Next she bore his brother Abel. Abel became a keeper of flocks, and Cain a tiller of the soil. In the course of time Cain brought an offering to the LORD from the fruit of the soil, while Abel, for his part, brought one of the best firstlings of his flock. The LORD looked with favor on Abel and his offering, but on Cain and his offering he did not. Cain greatly resented this and was crestfallen. So the LORD said to Cain: "Why are you so resentful and crestfallen? If you do well, you can hold up your head; but if not, sin is a demon lurking at the door: his urge is toward you, yet you can be his master." (Genesis 4:1-7)

    In the case of Manny Pacquiao, the Filipino boxer was at first faithful to the true Catholic Church of God and lavished the Mother of God with his devotion, veneration, respect and filial love in all his fights which he showed unashamedly to the whole world, and God, who is love, was very delighted with him and showered him with His graces like Abel. But when Pacquiao trashed the Church and the Mother of God like all BAEs did, God favored the ever faithful Catholic Marquez.

    You are telling us some of our Catholic athletes are wicked like Cain. I think you have a point there. Pacquiao was our Catholic athlete who became wicked like Cain. He is worst than Cain – he rejected the Church and Mother of God like all BAEs did. And besides, all wicked Catholics, as you call them, had already perverted, or planning to pervert into your Born Again Evangelicals, Iglesia ni Cristo and whatnots. I think that is God’s way of purging His Catholic Church. Good day, Mr. Soliman.
  • Jeanne d'Arce => Gerald John P. Soliman: Also, please answer the question of Manny Ambanloc Rosario, where did you get the notion that we don't believe that Jesus is God for nine months in Mary's womb?

    Mr. Soliman, it was not my notion. It was you who insinuated t
    hat in your blog with this URL: http://solutions-finder.blogspot.com/2009/11/refuting-mother-of-god-syllogisms.html. In your aforementioned post you said:

    “That being said, Mary only gave birth only to what is human in Christ, and she is the mother only of what is human in Christ.”

    My question to you and Manny Ambanloc Rosario and all the false prophets and false teachers of the Born Again Evangelicals is this: According to your false teaching, Mary conceived the humanity of Jesus Christ only. Can you tell us where was the Divine Spirit and Divine Soul of Jesus Christ all those nine months (1Thes 5:23)? Where is the God in Jesus Christ while He is gestating for nine months in the immaculate womb of the Blessed Virgin Mary? You are preaching Mary is not the Mother of God which is a very destructive heresy. Beware of your swift destruction:

    There were also false prophets among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you, who will introduce destructive heresies and even deny the Master who ransomed them, bringing swift destruction on themselves. (2Pt 2:1)
  • Manny Ambanloc Rosario Dirty Tactic # 1 = Use insults like "If you have brain, use it. Obviously, you didn’t." and "Hi gays"

    Dirty Tactic # 2= Keep on introducing new topics. When the thread is about the theory that God favors a Catholic to win boxing matches, introduce the
    question of the mystery of the divinity and humanity of Jesus in her mother's womb. Follow it up with the question "Does God prohibit sacred images?" even if that is not the topic of the thread.

    Dirty Tactic # 3 = Never answer difficult questions and hope your opponent forgets about them, like the question on your being apparent "respecter of persons" for respecting an archbishop for holding one view and insult another for holding the same view.

    Dirty Tactic # 4 = Insist on attacking the straw man you built. Insist that they believe something even if you cannot show it from their statements of faith and other doctrinal documents.
  • Jeanne d'Arce =>Manny Ambanloc Rosario: Dirty Tactic # 1 = Use insults like "If you have brain, use it. Obviously, you didn’t." and "Hi gays"

    Jeanne d’Arce: Does truth hurts?

    ---


    =>Manny Ambanloc Rosario: Dirty Tactic # 2= Keep on introducing new topics. When the thread is about the theory that God favors a Catholic to win boxing matches, introduce the question of the mystery of the divinity and humanity of Jesus in her mother's womb. Follow it up with the question "Does God prohibit sacred images?" even if that is not the topic of the thread.

    Jeanne d’Arce: They are all related topics towards eternal life. Read this verse and mull over it, ok?

    Now this is eternal life, that they should know you, the only true God, and the one whom you sent, Jesus Christ. (Jn 17:3)

    ---

    =>Manny Ambanloc Rosario: Dirty Tactic # 3 = Never answer difficult questions and hope your opponent forgets about them, like the question on your being apparent "respecter of persons" for respecting an archbishop for holding one view and insult another for holding the same view.

    Jeanne d’Arce: In the Spirit of Christmas, I don’t want to add insult to injury, but since you and Mr. Soliman are pleading for it, with regret, here goes: (1) I said Archbishop Cruz is a man of God, but I cannot said of the same to Mr. Soliman. (2) From your own mouth, you said, “showing favor to one on account of rank or title.” Not being a social climber, I don’t show favor to anyone on account of rank or title, but rather, on account of their standing with God. Arch. Cruz loves the Mother of God, while Mr. Soliman is well known to abhor the Mother of God. Just read his blog tags on Mariology (http://solutions-finder.blogspot.com/search/label/Mariology) and you can feel the seething raw enmity of Mr. Soliman to the Mother of God. Who do you think has the best standing with GOD WHO IS LOVE: Arch. Cruz or Mr. Soliman. I know you are vexed with my expected cliché but it’s you who broke my silence and it is unavoidable with your ilk, so, please pardon me if I have to repeat it: If you have brain, use it. (3) You are branding me of ‘being apparent "respecter of persons"’ – yes, I admit I am, provided if that person is pleasing to God. My friend, I know you people are self-claimed connoisseur of the Bible, and you know very well that only God is no respecter of persons (cf Act 10:34), that is, if that unique KJV translation is correct.

    ---

    =>Manny Ambanloc Rosario: Dirty Tactic # 4 = Insist on attacking the straw man you built. Insist that they believe something even if you cannot show it from their statements of faith and other doctrinal documents.

    Jeanne d’Arce: They are straw man to you because you are one of them. Birds of the same feathers, you know. But the fact remains that NOT ONE BORN AGAIN EVANGELICALS OR ANY PROTESTANTS OF ANY DENOMINATIONS, SECTS, CULTS, ASSEMBLIES, ETC. CANNOT EXPLAIN BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT YOUR FALSE DOCTRINE THAT THE DIVINITY OF THE LORD JESUS CHRIST WAS SEPARATED FROM HIS HUMANITY DURING THE NINE MONTHS CHRIST GOD WAS GESTATING IN THE IMMACULATE WOMB OF THE BLESSED VIRGIN MARY.

    People around the world will have a chance to read our exchanges, so, if there is a Protestant out there who can give a satisfactory answer to my question, please defend your false doctrine which is nothing but a destructive heresy that brings swift destruction on yourselves (cf 2Pt 2:1).

    Aping the parting shots of Mr. Soliman: “Is that all Manny Ambanloc Rosario?” And, “Dose of your own medicine.”

    Jeanne d’Arce: SHALOM. Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year of Faith.
  • Gerald John P. Soliman Jeanne d'Arce, it would be better if you quote the context of the statement where you got it:

    "We don't have to be considered as Nestorians for distinguishing the two natures. That being said, Mary only gave birth only to what is human in Christ, and
    she is the mother only of what is human in Christ. Therefore, Mary isn't the Mother of God and the Roman Catholic syllogism falls flat to the ground."

    I also wrote: "While Protestants agree that the two natures of Christ (human and divine) are inseparable in Him as a person, the characteristics and virtue of which can be distinguished and attributed in a given circumstance."

    It's so sad that you're using the same tactic as the INC and ADD.
  • The Splendor of the Church Fanpage oie Rodimus is on the show now...hahaha
  • Gerald John P. Soliman Merry Christmas, Fr. Abe!
  • Jeanne d'Arce =>Gerald John P. Soliman,

    If “Mary only gave birth only to what is human in Christ, and she is the mother only of what is human in Christ,” then please answer this question which you kept evading:

    Is Christ God inside Mary’s womb?
  • The Splendor of the Church Fanpage THANK YOU FOR THE GREETING MR. SOLIMAN. HOWEVER, YOUR GREETING IS EMPTY. WE ARE CELEBRATING THE BIRTH OF THE MESSIAH IT IS BECASUE WE BELIEVED THAT JESUS IS THE DIVINE LOGOS WHO CAME DOWN FROM HEAVEN, THAT HE IS THE INCARNATE GOD AND NOT HUMAN ONLY. YOU ARE TELLING Jeanne d'Arce THAT SHE IS USING INC TACTIC. O NO NO NO... YOU ARE USING INC REASONING AND ARGUMENT, NAMELY, JESUS IS HUMAN ONLY. PLEASE DON'T DISTORT THING.
  • Jeanne d'Arce Fr. Abe, Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.
  • The Splendor of the Church Fanpage MERRY CHRISTMAS TOO Jeanne d'Arce. MAY THE BIRTH OF THE GOD-CHILD BRING BLESSINGS TO YOU AND YOUR FAMILY.
  • Gerald John P. Soliman @ Jeanne D'Arce, Christ was both human and divine in Mary's womb. So?
  • Gerald John P. Soliman Fr. Abe: HOWEVER, YOUR GREETING IS EMPTY.

    This is the reason why I like discussing with Prof. Gitamondoc more than you.
  • Jeanne d'Arce => Gerald John P. Soliman @ Jeanne D'Arce, Christ was both human and divine in Mary's womb. So?

    Jeanne D'Arce: So? If you have brain, use it.

    Here are simple syllogisms:


    Mary is the Mother of Jesus Christ. Jesus Christ was both human and divine in Mary's womb – the Man-God. Mary is the Mother of the Man-God.

    Mary is the Mother of the Man-God. The Man-God was the Son of Man and the Son of God. Mary is the Mother of the Son of Man and the Son of God.

    Mary is the Mother of the Son of Man and the Son of God. The Son of Man and the Son of God is Man and God. Mary is the Mother of Man and God.

    And this is the mystery unfathomable by the Protestants: Mary is the Mother of both Man and God. God made His Mother as Mother of man too:

    When Jesus therefore had seen his mother and the disciple standing whom he loved, he saith to his mother: Woman, behold thy son. After that, he saith to the disciple: Behold thy mother. And from that hour, the disciple took her to his own. (Jn 19:26-27, Douay-Rheims Catholic Bible)

    Search through all available and credible Bible versions and translations and the name of the beloved disciple was never disclosed. The reason why? Anybody can be the disciple loved by Jesus Christ God if that disciple is beholden to His Mother.

    To recap: So? If you have brain, use it.
  • Jeanne d'Arce =>Gerald John P. Soliman: Fr. Abe: HOWEVER, YOUR GREETING IS EMPTY. This is the reason why I like discussing with Prof. Gitamondoc more than you.

    Jeanne D'Arce: Ah, so you are no respecter of Fr. Abe. Are you now making yourself God also, Whom you m
    ade no respecter of persons by your King James Version? Fr. Abe loves the Mother of God while you, and all Born Again Evangelicals, abhors the Mother of God. Fr. Abe is accepted by God more than any single Protestant who has enmity with the Mother of God. Read this verse from your own Bible and educate yourselves:

    Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons: but in every nation he that feareth him, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with him. (Act 10:34-35, KJV)

    Merry Christmas, my friends, God is merciful and just. Repent and recant your satanic sentiments to the Mother of God. She is your Mother too even though you are rejecting Her. And believe me, SHE LOVES YOU MORE THAN YOU WILL EVER KNOW. She even forgives Judas Iscariot, who betrayed Her Son, but it was his unrepentant heart that made him hang himself on a tree.

    Today is Christmas day and more than two thousand years ago, the Mother you misunderstood and wrongly accused of fabricated lies, all brainchild of Satan and his minions, was suckling the God-Child with Her perpetually virgin breasts and immaculate colostrums from the immaculate blood of the Immaculate Mother.

    Again, your accustomed cliché: If you have brain, use it.
  • Jeanne d'Arce =>Gerald John P. Soliman: "We don't have to be considered as Nestorians for distinguishing the two natures."

    Jeanne d'Arce: You also lack originality. Here’s the source of your destructive heretical idea: Anthony Pezzotta, one of those wicked Cathol
    ics who perverted into your newly invented American false faith. In his book TRUTH ENCOUNTER, pages 133-134, apostate ex-Catholic priest Pezzotta wrote:

    [Yet millions of people call Mary “the mother of God” and pray to her as such. They justify this by saying that she is the true mother of Jesus, and since Jesus is God, she is the mother of God. They simply fail to distinguish the human and divine natures of Jesus.]

    Who are you fooling except yourselves and those you had deceived? You are hiding your true hide of Nestorianism under the skirt called “Distinguish.” Nestorius separates the divine and human natures of Jesus, while according to your horse’s mouth, you just distinguish the divine and human natures of Jesus. What a flimsy alibi. Tell that to the marines.

    Let’s consult Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary:
    Distinguish, verb, transitive senses
    1 : to perceive a difference in : mentally separate <so alike they could not be distinguished>
    2 a : to mark as separate or different b : to separate into kinds, classes, or categories

    There you are: distinguishing the divine and human natures of Jesus Christ is tantamount to separating the divine and human natures of Jesus Christ.
    ---
    =>Gerald John P. Soliman: “That being said, Mary only gave birth only to what is human in Christ, and she is the mother only of what is human in Christ.”

    Jeanne d'Arce: Sorry for you. You just contradicted yourself when you said, “@ Jeanne D'Arce, Christ was both human and divine in Mary's womb.”
    ---
    =>Gerald John P. Soliman: “Therefore, Mary isn't the Mother of God and the Roman Catholic syllogism falls flat to the ground.”

    Jeanne d'Arce: No, no, no. You are conceding Mary is the Mother of God because according to your admission: “Christ was both human and divine in Mary's womb.” Therefore, your destructive heresy that Mary isn't the Mother of God falls flat to your faces.
    ---
    =>Gerald John P. Soliman: I also wrote: "While Protestants agree that the two natures of Christ (human and divine) are inseparable in Him as a person, the characteristics and virtue of which can be distinguished and attributed in a given circumstance."

    Jeanne d'Arce: According to the aforementioned dictionary above, to distinguish means: to separate mentally; to mark as separate or different; to separate into kinds, classes, or categories. Again, your flimsy alibi falls flat to your faces.
    ---
    =>Gerald John P. Soliman: “It's so sad that you're using the same tactic as the INC and ADD.”

    Jeanne d'Arce: No, no, no. It’s you and your ilks that are using the same tactics as the INC and ADD, being of the same feathers – all belonging to its own newly invented false faith contradicting one another. Oh, boy. What a mess Protestantism had spawned.
    ---
    A word of advice from the Scriptures:

    Seek the LORD while he may be found, call him while he is near. Let the scoundrel forsake his way, and the wicked man his thoughts; Let him turn to the LORD for mercy; to our God, who is generous in forgiving. (Isa 55:6-7)

    Jeanne d'Arce: Shalom.
  • Gerald John P. Soliman @ Jean d'Arce:

    My turn to ask the questions:

    1. Jesus Christ was sleeping in a boat in Mark 4:38. Since Jesus is God, can you say with all honesty that God is sleeping?


    2. Do you accept this syllogism as well: Mary is the mother of Jesus. Jesus is God. God is a Trinity. Therefore, Mary is the mother of the Trinity.

    I do hope you will have the integrity to answer those, without the help of Fr. Abe of course.
  • Jeanne d'Arce =>Gerald John P. Soliman:

    Those are peanuts you are asking me. OK, let’s make a deal. If I answered your two questions below, you will announce publicly to the whole world through your blog Solutions Finder Apologetics [
    http://solutions-finder.blogspot.com/] that Mary was indeed the Mother of God and the teachings of the Protestants that Mary was not the Mother of God was a deception and snare of Satan which you swallowed hook, line and sinker:

    1. Jesus Christ was sleeping in a boat in Mark 4:38. Since Jesus is God, can you say with all honesty that God is sleeping?

    2. Do you accept this syllogism as well: Mary is the mother of Jesus. Jesus is God. God is a Trinity. Therefore, Mary is the mother of the Trinity.

    If I can’t answer those questions, I will denounce likewise that Mary was the Mother of God.

    Do we have a gentleman’s deal?
  • Manny Ambanloc Rosario My dictionary tells me that a gentleman is "a well-mannered and considerate man with high standards of proper behavior." A man who consistently hurls insults and is unrepentant about it is not a gentleman. What "gentleman's deal" are you talking about?
  • Jeanne d'Arce =>Manny Ambanloc Rosario:

    That was your measure of a gentleman.

    God looks at the hearts of those who love His Mother and they are those on whom his favor rests and are gentlemen to him.


    As for you haters of the Mother of God, you know where to go.
  • Gerald John P. Soliman Jeanne d'Arce: "If I can’t answer those questions, I will denounce likewise that Mary was the Mother of God.

    Do we have a gentleman’s deal?"

    Actually you in effect did renounce Mary isn't the mother of God because you didn't answer my question.
  • Jeanne d'Arce Should I? But you didn't agreed with our deal yet? Is it a go?
  • Gerald John P. Soliman The mere fact that you're making a deal with me shows that you're afraid to answer it. That's a sign you've lost.
  • Jeanne d'Arce =>Gerald John P. Soliman,

    You are getting jittery and delusional. Relax. I said your questions are peanuts to me – meaning I can easily answer them without missing a beat that is why I am making a deal with you. It’s you who’s afraid with my dare,
    that’s why you chickened out and lost your temper through your alter ego Manny Ambanloc Rosario.

    The mere fact that you've skirted the deal only shows that you're afraid my answers will expose and confute your destructive heresy that Mary was not the Mother of God. That's a sign you've lost.

    C’mon, be man enough to face the music. Show to the world you are not a coward. You can do it. Is it a deal or no deal?
  • Gerald John P. Soliman No the mere fact that you didn't answer it and making a deal with me only shows your cowardice. And you're desperate for a win that you even allege that I am also Mr. Manny Ambanloc Rosario, you're so dead wrong.

    Anyway, I don't have time to deal with losers like you and Fr. Abe.
  • The Splendor of the Church Fanpage LOOSERS? YOU ARE THE ONE WHO IS TRYING HARD TO CALL THE ATTENTION OF FR. ABE. AS IF WE DON'T KNOW YOU. YOU ARE THE RODIMUS WHO AFTER BEING SHAMED AGAIN AND AGAIN IS CHANGING YOUR MASKS IN ORDER TO HIDE IN SHAME.
  • Jeanne d'Arce => Gerald John P. Soliman and all haters of the Mother of God, read and understand what He is saying:

    Jn 8:42: Jesus said to them, "If God were your Father, you would love me, for I came from God and am here; I did not come on my own, but he sent me.

    GAL 4:4: But when the fullness of time had come, God sent his Son, born of a woman, born under the law.

    MT 1:23: "Behold, the virgin shall be with child and bear a son, and they shall name him Emmanuel," which means "God is with us."

    LK 2:7: And she gave birth to her firstborn son. She wrapped him in swaddling clothes and laid him in a manger, because there was no room for them in the inn.

    Lk 2:10: The angel said to them, "Do not be afraid; for behold, I proclaim to you good news of great joy that will be for all the people. For today in the city of David a savior has been born for you who is Messiah and Lord. And this will be a sign for you: you will find an infant wrapped in swaddling clothes and lying in a manger."

    Jn 19:26: When Jesus saw his mother and the disciple there whom he loved, he said to his mother, "Woman, behold, your son." Then he said to the disciple, "Behold, your mother." And from that hour the disciple took her into his home.

    Jn 8:43-44: Why do you not understand what I am saying? Because you cannot bear to hear my word. You belong to your father the devil and you willingly carry out your father's desires. He was a murderer from the beginning and does not stand in truth, because there is no truth in him. When he tells a lie, he speaks in character, because he is a liar and the father of lies.

    Jeanne d'Arce: Happy New Year of Faith to all those who believed Jesus Christ is God who sleeps and those who have recourse and are beholden to the Mother of God – the Triune God.

1 comment: